Sunday, January 31, 2010

Solar Powered Electric Vehicle Charging - Four Visions















Sanyo thinks its joint strengths in solar and in batteries make solar charging stations an obvious market to pursue. Here's one solar station - Sanyo unveiled its HIT prototype charging station at CES and plans a more modest canopy to be unveiled in Portland within the first quarter of this year.
The idea of solar-powered charging stations is enticing. Sanyo, one company preparing many solar canopies and parking lot panel solutions, believes a 10 ft. by 20 ft. solar canopy parking space cover can generate enough electricity to run the electric vehicle annually. Here are three other visions for implementing solar charging for electric vehicles either in the works, or already out on the streets.
2. Beautiful Earth Group's Brooklyn container-based charging station. This is the container-box vision of a charging station now on view in Red Hook, Brookly.n The system is just a demonstration unit, and its builder Beautiful Earth Group is coy about the cost. Yet it is a great use of decommissioned steel shipping containers, a TreeHugger favorite, and blends right into a gritty urban landscape. Currently, this is not a public charging station, instead providing the juice for Beautiful Earth's electric MINI E. According to the company, the car takes three hours to charge at the station.
 
 3. Toyota Solar Charging Station. Toyota Industries has plans to build a network of these charging stations in Tokyo's Aichi Prefecture -- 21 stations at eleven locations are scheduled to be installed over the next few months -- and then test them out with Toyota Priuses. Eventually the system is intended to be for public use. The output of the solar panel is 1.9 kW, and the capacity of the storage battery is 8.4kWh.
 
  4. Columb Technologies and Envision Solar Grove McDonald's installation. This charger canopy at a McDonald's restaurant in Pacific Beach, California, is one of the many Columb/Envision projects. Dell's HQ parking lot has a similar system consisting of 11 "Solar Trees" which provide shade for 56 cars and 131,000 kilowatt hours annually. However, Envision says that the Solar Tree at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado is the charging model for the future. It is a 3kW system and powers two NREL hybrid-electric vehicles.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Fastest Growing Green Jobs

If you thought 2009 was a year that green took over, then think again. Over the next 10 years, the green industry is predicted to experience growth in the neighborhood of 1.5 trillion dollars. Green will continue to shape the foods we eat, the products we buy, and the way we get around -- and increasingly the jobs we have. 



According to the Pew Charitable Trusts, by 2007, more than 68,200 businesses across the country accounted for more than 770,000 jobs in clean energy, "despite a lack of sustained government support in the past decade." This is expected to increase with fresh help from the Obama administration. In 2008 alone, private investors directed $5.9 billion into American businesses in this sector, a 48% increase over 2007. This rate should continue to accelerate.

Here are five green careers that are not entirely new, but are now being completely reinvented. If you want to keep a competitive advantage in the workforce, one must learn how these top-growing jobs are "going green." These fields, according the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), are expected to see a growth from 6% to nearly 30%. 

Mechanical Engineer

$59,000 to $94,000 median salary range, according to the BLS. Mechanical engineering will have many opportunities in the future. However, you don't have to wait to start in green areas of this field. Nearly all energy areas, including wind and solar, need these engineers. 


You will need a four-year engineering degree to start. If you have your degree, there are three great websites that can help you work green: the American Wind Energy Association, the Solar Energy Industries Association and the American Solar Energy Society.  

Environmental Engineer

$56,000 to $94,000 median salary range (BLS). One of the hardest hit fields in the recent recession has been engineering, due to contractions in the auto industry and infrastructure spending. Fortunately, this profession has numerous applications in the green field. 


Environmental engineers are expected to see a 30% increase in jobs over the next ten years. They will be vital in the wind and solar fields. In addition, environmental engineer technicians and civil engineers should see a 25% growth. 


If you are looking for a job in this field, a great place to start is the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. You may also want to plug yourself into the Association of Energy Engineers, which offers training for engineers to become energy auditors.

Environmental Educator

$47,000 to $50,000 median salary range (BLS). The teaching field is expected to expand by almost 20% in the coming years. What's exciting is that weaving green practices into the classroom is becoming much more commonplace. Many schools are on the forefront of using clean energy. And science teachers are in the most demand. 


Beyond the basics like environmental science, many community colleges have expanded offerings in courses like solar panel installation and energy efficient building; universities have expanded environmental policy and politics offerings, often developing entirely new departments and curricula; and graduate programs are routinely offering advanced courses in a range of subjects, like corporate sustainability. There are even green MBA programs. All of these new positions need teachers to fill them. 


Becoming a teacher involves a college diploma and generally a teaching certificate. If you are an out-of-work professional you may want to consider getting a teaching certificate. While the full degree may cost you around $8 to $20 thousand a year, a teaching certificate may cost around half. 


In order to really save money, you might want to consider community college first. This will allow you to take general education classes at a much more affordable price. Don't forget that there are plenty of student loans available through the federal government. A guidance counselor will be able to point you in the right direction.  

Heating and Cooling Installer

$15 to $25/hour (BLS). If you are looking for a great green job and are not interested in the college route, then heating and cooling could be the field for you. It is expected to see more than 28% growth in the coming years. Being able to install an extremely efficient solar water heater can not only put more money in your pocket, it will save the customer money in the long term and help them go green. Installers are able to put some of the most cutting edge energy-saving products to use right away. 

Another reason for the strong growth is the increasing emphasis on green building, supported by the United States Green Building Council and the federal and state and local governments. Heating and cooling play a big role in energy saving. 

For a more specialized training, look into geothermal. One particular training provider in this area is the GeoExchange, which can help you find the programs to get started today!  

Arborist                          

$9 to $14/hour (BLS). If you want to get a green job outdoors then this may be the career for you. There are many variations of this job. Tree trimmers, pruners, and landscapers are expected to see more than 26% growth. Green arborists help protect plants from disease and pests with less-toxic, environmentally friendly techniques. They can also work to minimize harmful runoff, protect watersheds, and shade property, which leads to less energy demands for cooling. A good place to start learning about the career is the Arbor Day Foundation.


Finding a green job is getting easier every day. If these don't work for you, make sure to check out a Green Careers Guide.
Article by Ezra Drissman of GreenCareersGuide Reprinted with permission of Hearst Communications, Inc

Friday, January 29, 2010

How to Find Green Jobs Training?

Green jobs are one of the most rapidly expanding areas in which you could start looking for a new career. The catch is that many of these careers are brand new and as a result, you will need training to understand how they can be performed. Therefore, you are going to need to find green jobs training as you are expanding into an exciting new field.
Most green jobs training programs will actually be found through the positions open themselves, so you will not have to worry too much about how to learn to perform a new job. You will find, however, that the more skills which you have from the beginning, the more attractive you will be to those hiring for a new position open.
As you start to find new positions opening up, you will want to consider where you are going to get green jobs training from. One immediate solution could be to turn to additional schooling. By taking some classes about environmental sciences, practices, and laws, you can become more of an asset toward anyone who is hiring for a new position. The better that you are able to understand all of the current practices going on, the less green jobs training you will need.
You will also want to think about how you can apply skill sets that you already have toward your green jobs training. Understanding how to adapt yourself and your skills to a new position will help you to stand out more as well. You'll begin to see that adapting what we already have is going to be an important quality of moving into the future. Demonstrating the fact that you are going to be a valuable asset can be an important part of training, especially considering that many green jobs are only now being formulated and are still a growing process.
Seminars put out by eco-friendly companies and organizations can be another way to get the green jobs training which will ultimately help you to land a new career. Once you start to fully understand exactly how every single action that you take is going to have a major impact on the environment, you will begin to see why it is so important for you to move into the future with looking for environmentally friendly jobs. Green jobs training will be one small part of preparing yourself for a great future career, but it will be something that you will be happy that you took the time to invest in.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

D.LIGHT Receives UNFCCC Approval for Ground-Breaking Carbon Offset Project

D.LIGHT RECEIVES United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) APPROVAL FOR GROUND-BREAKING CARBON OFFSET PROJECT

Approval Marks One of the First Times Portable Solar Lanterns Will Generate Carbon Credits


New Delhi, India - D.light Design today announced that it has received approval from the UNFCCC for a ground-breaking carbon offset project in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in India. The project, which innovatively tracks the reduction in carbon emissions that result from D.light solar lamps replacing kerosene lanterns, is the first of its kind to receive UNFCCC approval. The decision by the UN body, the only organization with a global mandate to evaluate the effectiveness of emission control systems, acknowledges the extent to which portable solar lighting products can contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions on a global scale.

Kerosene and other fuel-based sources of lighting are one of the top contributors to greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world. It is estimated that a single kerosene lantern may emit as much as 1 ton of carbon dioxide over the course of five years; each year, kerosene lamps are responsible for over 100 tons of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere.

“D.light’s solar lanterns vastly improve the lives of our individual customers, but they also benefit the global environment,” said D.light CEO Sam Goldman. “Every D.light solar lantern purchased means that less kerosene oil is being burned and fewer carbon emissions are polluting the atmosphere. D.light is proud to be a leader in providing quality products for off-grid families and in doing our part to combat global warming.”

UNFCCC approval is only given to applicants who meet a set of strict requirements, including definitively proving that the project contributes to carbon reductions and developing a scientifically reliable monitoring and tracking system. A majority of previous solar projects approved by the UNFCCC have primarily consisted of solar farms or other fixed, large-scale solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, which makes tracking carbon offsets fairly simple.

In contrast, D.light solar lanterns are individually utilized by hundreds of thousands of different households who regularly transport the lanterns between the home, workplace and field. As part of meeting UNFCCC requirements, D.light is pioneering an innovative monitoring and tracking system that will change the way carbon offsets are measured. The streamlined monitoring process will allow D.light to scale the project quickly across diverse distribution channels and geographic regions.

True to its social mission, D.light considers the carbon offset project as a creative strategy to make its solar-powered lanterns more affordable and accessible for customers around the world. All revenue from the resulting carbon credits will directly support D.light’s efforts to scale and meet the global need for solar-powered lighting for families who are currently relying on dim and polluting kerosene lanterns.

This impact should grow exponentially in the coming years. Even as implementation in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar begins, D.light is already taking steps to expand the project to other countries across multiple continents in the near future.

About D.light Design
D.light Design is an international consumer products company providing high quality solutions for people without access to reliable electricity. Our mission is to enable
households without reliable electricity to attain the same quality of life as those with electricity. We will begin by replacing every kerosene lantern with clean, safe and bright light. By 2020, we aim to have improved the lives of 100 million individuals.

D.light was recently awarded the Social Venture Network’s 2009 Innovation Award, and named as one of the world’s top 100 clean technology enterprises by the CleanTech Group. It has also been featured in Fortune Magazine, Time Magazine, BusinessWeek, and the New York Times. It is financed by prestigious venture capital firms including Nexus Venture Partners, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Garage Technology Ventures, the Mahindra Group; with investment from leading social enterprise funds Acumen Fund and Gray Matters Capital. To learn more, please visit their site.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

How Plastic-Free Living is Done: An Interview with Beth Terry from Fake Plastic Fish


Beth Terry Talks About How She's Learned To Minimize The Plastic In Her Life Since 2007



Beth Terry started her quest to live without plastic, or at least with (a lot) less plastic, in 2007. The challenge has been full of lessons and surprises—and a growing community of people wanting to shun plastic—ever since, and she's blogged about it at Fake Plastic Fish every step of the way. I had a chance to chat with her recently about how what the plastic-free life looks like.

Planet Green: What have been the biggest surprises for you since you took on the plastic-free challenge? 
Beth Terry: The biggest surprise was realizing that all the plastic I put in my recycle bin might not actually get recycled. I was under the impression, like most people are, that you put something in your recycle bin and that's it. But recycle is a market and if there's no one to buy it, it just sits there or it gets landfilled. Most of our recycling and other materials get shipped to China and other Asian countries.


A lot of plastic that does get recycled is basically getting shipped somewhere else and turned back into plastic that gets sent back over here—and a lot of that is, you know, plastic crap. A lot of it is made into decking material, but it's actually just a process of heading toward the landfill. It's not recycled indefinitely.

PG: Have most of the changes come from switching to materials other than plastic, or from just reducing overall consumption?
BT: It's definitely about reducing consumption. In 2008, my computer monitor died and I took to a computer repair guy. He figured out what was wrong and called HP to get the part, but HP wouldn't sell the part—they would only say to send it back and they'd replace it. Supposedly I have an HP representative that I'm supposed to talk with about that, we'll see. Things these days are built to break and not to last. So I went on Craigslist and found a used monitor.

Really the only new things I've bought have been things to reduce waste, things like stainless steel water bottles, and stainless steel takeout containers—things for leftovers or takeout that I take with me everywhere I go. I bought a soda maker—I make soda water, put a little bit of lemon or something in it, and store in a glass carafe so I'm not putting it into plastic.
When we got our cats, we needed litter boxes and cat carrier boxes—we got those from Freecycle and from thrift stores.

The plastics industry has been really pushing on the green bandwagon, saying plastic is better because it weighs less than glass. But there are so many other considerations—the chemicals and toxicity, the harm that's being done to wildlife. It's a false dichotomy because the answer really is cutting consumption. If the plastics industry can define what green is, they can define themselves as green, but green is so much more than that.

PG: Have you found any sort of magic tricks for items that are seemingly impossible to get without plastic--i.e. medications, etc.?
BT: I haven't, but there are some great homemade remedies. When I got a cold this winter, I used up some old meds that I had from before I went plastic-free, and then I found a way to make my own cough syrup—but I didn't have a chance to try it out because I wasn't coughing anymore.
I put it online and people posted comments—a lot of people said honey is really good, and doctors are now recommending honey for kids because they don't want to give cough syrup to kids anymore.

When I ran out of Rolaids, people had all kinds of remedies, so a lot of home remedies will help substitute for meds wrapped in plastic. The thing that surprised me is that pharmacies won't refill your bottles, they say it's against the law. But it seems to me the natural thing to do, if you're just going to refill it with the exact same thing,  

I haven't found any real miracle solutions, except that for deodorant, I switched to baking soda. It's been amazing—if I stopped caring about plastic tomorrow, I'd still use baking soda. Some people cut it with corn starch because they feel it's too intense, but I haven't had a problem. There's no odor, and I have found it even acts as somewhat of an antiperspirant—and it's not because of aluminum.

One of the more extreme things that we started doing—although we enjoy it now—is making our own cat food. We started going through tons and tons of cans and bags, and the inside of the cans is lined with plastic, which has BPA in it.

PG: Have you found products that are major "hidden" users of plastic?
BT: Pretty much everything comes packaged in "invisible" plastic before getting to the store, we only see the unwrapped items on the shelf. Cutting our consumption in general will reduce our plastic consumption. My dad wrote to me after buying a new mattress and said the amount of plastic it came wrapped in would have made me faint.

There are items made from plastic that aren't actually hidden but that many people don't realize are plastic. Synthetic textiles, for example. Polar fleece blankets and jackets. Synthetic carpets. Most athletic wear. Polyester, acrylic, spandex are all types of plastic. I avoid buying fabrics made from synthetic materials.

Cars are another huge source of plastic. In addition to all the greenhouse gas emissions they generate from fuel burning, their interiors are full of plastics that offgas, especially when hot. That new car smell? Chemicals offgasing from plastic.

PG: Did you experience much of a learning curve once you started Fake Plastic Fish?

BT: Absolutely. But I didn't try to eliminate all plastics at once, and I would never recommend anyone else do it that way either. It's the road to burnout.

There have been several journalists and bloggers who attempted to go "plastic-free" for a month or a week and of course, they found it impossible to do. Their conclusions at the end of their experiments were less than encouraging. But it's a process. With each step, you develop new habits, which eventually become automatic. You start remembering to ask for no disposables when you go to a restaurant. You automatically grab your reusable bags or travel mug before leaving the house. You learn that you can live without the convenience foods you might have once relied on.

Even now, I sometimes forget. I just got back from visiting my family in Hawaii and am sad to admit that I brought with me three plastic drinking straws. Three! That's how many times I forgot to tell the server I didn't need one. And it's two more than I collected in all of 2009!

PG: Have you found a favorite or most creative/fun trick for reusing plastic?

BT: In the beginning of this project, I knitted a fake plastic fish out of used grocery bags, and last year, I created a crazy plastic sea monster costume out of plastic from my previous years' stash that actually won the 2009 Bay to Breakers costume contest.

Other than silly stuff like that, I don't really enjoy using plastic as a craft material. Honestly, if I never have to wear that plastic costume again, it'll be too soon.


Article by Rachel Cernansky Courtesy of PlanetGreen.com http://planetgreen.discovery.com/work-connect/plastic-free-living-interview.html?campaign=daily_nl

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Are School Gardens Cheating Kids Out of an Education?

One Take On The Schoolyard Garden Debate.

I learned to remove weeds by their roots in kindergarten. I was sitting in the school garden and at first I thought you could just grab 'em and yank -- but it was not so simple. In the most recent issue of The Atlantic author Caitlin Flanagan writes a scathing article on school gardens, particularly the Edible Schoolyard program led by Alice Waters in California. I honestly didn't realize one could have such harsh words for a little school gardening. School gardens seem to encourage healthy eating and alternative educational experiences, but in a bankrupt school system with high dropout rates, it is not so simple, at least not to Flanagan.
Flanagan argues that school gardens are taking kids out of the classroom and wasting the state's precious resources, while those children should be hitting the books and getting the knowledge to pass the standardized tests they need to graduate and advance to the California higher education system (although that system is also struggling for money). She sees a child picking lettuce as a cruel irony. She starts her article by describing a hypothetical family of migrant workers who have a son born in the United States. As a citizen he attends an American school fulfilling a dream his parents had for him -- only to be picking lettuce in the hot sun instead of studying in the classroom pursuing the better life his parents worked to get him.
Flanagan goes on to describes the agenda of California’s schoolyard gardens as "patronizing." If it was "promulgated in the Jim Crow South by a white man who was espousing a sharecropping curriculum for African American students, we would see it for what it is: a way of bestowing field work and low expectations on a giant population of students who might become troublesome if they actually got an education."
But this is after quoting a section of the agenda, that really needs to be quoted again here:
Some families, particularly those from other countries, may feel uncomfortable when asked to help out at school because their English skills or educational background do not give them a solid classroom footing. For these families, the living classroom of a garden can be a much more inviting environment in which to engage in their children’s education.
In another piece in The Atlantic, Corby Kummer, who often writes on food topics for the magazine, responds to her attacks. He cites cases where student grades and understanding of lessons has improved with the addition of school gardens. He defends the program and Alice Waters and discusses the effects the gardens have on children's diets and the effect they could have on the rising problem of childhood obesity. What the gardens appear to have little effect on is the state's budget, as they use no additional public funds.
Financial problems, low grades and poor student health are just some of the problems affecting the California school system. It seems obvious that sweeping changes are needed to help fix it. I don't think a school garden was ever intended to fix the system. It's one program among many working towards a better system. Unfortunately, it seems to be the best know program and therefore it's getting an unfair amount of attention and now blame in this very political argument.
What I can offer in defense of school gardens is my own story. During elementary school I attended the Waldorf School of Garden City in Long Island, N.Y. Waldorf schools' principles are based on Rudolf Steiner philosophies -- he developed biodynamic farming among many other achievements. As you might imagine we had a school garden. We didn't spend a lot of time in the garden, perhaps as much time as another class would spend studying a class pet, but it gave me a good perspective on where food comes from. I was actively part of the story of growing food. During childhood (and even now) the lessons that stuck with me best had a great story or were taught in a unique way. I believe I have a healthy appetite and a respect for where my food comes from, because I was involved in the weeding, the composting, the creation of food. This was a novel experience for me. My parents didn't garden and before coming to school I wouldn't have been exposed to this lesson. To me a school garden's simplest and perhaps greatest achievement is putting your food into context. This is how a carrot grows; this is how it's picked. I don't have that kind of relationship with Fritos, so I don't eat them very much. In the same vein, my teacher told us a story of a licorice factory to help us learn subtraction, and I do have fond mathematical memories I associate with licorice -- but that's a whole other story.